≡ Menu

India and the Middle East: Delhi begins a re-think | The Indian Express

If the army feels it requires continuation of the AFSPA to discharge its responsibilities, no other agency is qualified to credibly challenge that view. The external affairs minister Salman Khurshid is sitting down,this weekend in Bahrain,for a long overdue brainstorming session with the Indian envoys to the Middle East.  After all,no part of the world has seen as much political convulsion in recent years as the Middle East; and in no region is India such a prisoner to pre-determined positions. The internal tumult generated by the Arab Spring and the shift in regional geopolitics flowing from the interim nuclear accord between Washington and Tehran are only two among the many factors demanding that Delhi take a new look at the region. The Foreign Office,for one,could start with a review of the nomenclature. India is probably alone in identifying the region as West Asia. Delhi must discard this narcissism,and adopt a name the countries of the region themselves prefer,the Middle East. The more urgent challenge is to overcome segmented policy-making towards the region in the Foreign Office. For example,Iran is part of a division that deals with Pakistan and Afghanistan. The Arab countries of the Gulf are under a separate part of the ministry. And yet another division deals with what is called West Asia and North Africa. Turkey,which once ruled the region and is seeking to expand its influence in the region,is under a senior official who deals with Europe. By having envoys to most of these countries in one room,Khurshid is starting a conversation that might help Delhi better understand the Middle East as a whole and the interconnections between its various sub-regions. A comprehensive approach to the Middle East should also allow Delhi to recast the anti-Western framework that has long guided Indias regional policy. While the West remains a major external influence,America and Europe are not always aligned on regional issues. Whether it was the American invasion of Iraq in 2003,or U.S. reluctance to intervene in Syria this year,there are major frictions within the West. Americas historic dependence on the region for oil supplies is coming to an end as the U.S. and its neighbours in the Western hemisphere are becoming major producers of hydrocarbons. China,which has replaced America as the largest importer of oil from the Gulf,is steadily expanding its political influence in the region. Russia meanwhile has begun to play hardball in the Middle East. The shift in the great power dynamic is matched by the sharpening of regional contradictionsbetween the Sunni and the Shia and the Arabs and Persians. Minorities and majorities,long deprived of their political and religious rights,have become assertive and finding supporting from kindred communities and governments across borders. Indias traditional rhetoric on third worldism is not of much use in understanding the current turbulence in the Middle East. Khurshids conversations in Bahrain,one hopes,will let Delhi develop a strategic perspective of the region and help reclaim Indias once pivotal role in the Middle East. (The writer is a distinguished fellow at the Observer Research Foundation,Delhi and a contributing editor for The Indian Express)
Source : Click Here

{ 0 comments… add one }

Leave a Comment