≡ Menu

Strategic Autonomy | The Indian Express

If the army feels it requires continuation of the AFSPA to discharge its responsibilities, no other agency is qualified to credibly challenge that view. STRATEGIC AUTONOMY. China wont like it. That has been a consistent refrain of the UPA government and the Congress party in shaping Indias recent foreign policy. New Delhis self-induced fear of provoking China has restricted the pursuit of beneficial engagement with other major powers and Asian neighbours. Indias self-denial is hardly consistent with its proclamations on strategic autonomy. But it is no secret that the UPA and the Congress deploy the argument of strategic autonomy only against the United States. You dont have to be a genius to figure out that it is Chinas rising power that constricts Delhis strategic policy in the subcontinent and the Indian Ocean. Even on the world stage,it is China that has made it difficult for India to pursue its aspirations. Beijing tried to block Delhis historic civil nuclear initiative with Washington that sought to lift three and a half decades of international nuclear sanctions against India. China has also been the only permanent member of the UNSC that is unwilling to support Indias membership of this exclusive club. Yet the Congress party wants Delhi to remain equidistant from Washington and Beijing. The wide divergence between India and China does not mean Delhi should limit its engagement with Beijing. On the contrary,the rise of China demands Delhi intensify its cooperation with Beijing and prudently manage the multiple differences. What is baffling,however,is the UPAs perverse policy of limiting Indias cooperation with other countries by citing Beijings sensitivities. Defence Minister A.K. Antony,for example,has stopped the Indian navy conducting multilateral exercises in the Indian Ocean,slowed down military cooperation with the US and limited Indias defence diplomacy with Chinas neighbours in the name of strategic autonomy. China does not take Indias sensitivities into account when deepening defence cooperation with Pakistan. As an exponent of realpolitik,China does not expect India to negate its own interests. But if the UPA offers such deference,why should Beijing complain? POWER POLITICS. The next government in Delhi could hopefully learn a thing or two from Russia and China on how to play the game in a multipolar world. On the one hand,Moscow and Beijing are determined to limit American power. On the other,Moscow and Beijing seek separate bilateral deals with Washington. Russias Vladimir Putin bails Americas Barack Obama out of Syria. Russia plays hardball with Washington but seizes moments for expanded cooperation. Chinas Xi Jinping wants to build a new type of great power relationship with America. There are always enough people in Washington and Beijing who dream about a G-2 or a Sino-American condominium. Put simply,in a multipolar world,the great powers play the field. No one gives up beneficial cooperation with one for fear of offending another. The motto is to engage all and cooperate with one to improve the bargaining power with the other. RUSSIAN REALISM. Russia has drawn very close to China in the last two decades. But Moscow is not holding back from doing things that Beijing does not like. Consider two recent moves by Putin. Visiting Hanoi this week,Putin reaffirmed Russias commitment to deepen the defence partnership with Vietnam. Putin is taking advantage of the tensions between China and Vietnam in the South China Sea and raising its own profile in East Asia. Moscow has already agreed to sell six Kilo-class submarines that would help Vietnam blunt Chinas growing naval might in the South China Sea. Surely,there is more to follow. Russia is also negotiating with Vietnam access arrangements to Cam Ranh Bay that will boost Moscows naval presence in the South China Sea. Russia is also cosying up to Japan,even as Beijing and Tokyo quarrel over a few islands in the East China Sea. Earlier this month,Russia and Japan held their first ever two-plus-two dialogue,involving the defence and foreign ministers of both sides. Russia is only the third country,after the US and Australia,that Japan has formed such a forum with at the ministerial level. Russia has not done this with any other country not China,not India. As Russia and Japan try to resolve longstanding bilateral disputes,they have launched security and defence cooperation as part of an effort to improve their leverage with China. But the Delhi durbar under the UPA has locked itself in conceptual confusion and allowed presumed Chinese concerns to define the limits of Indias foreign policy. The writer is a distinguished fellow at the Observer Research Foundation,Delhi and a contributing editor for The Indian Express
Source : Click Here

{ 0 comments… add one }

Leave a Comment